Legal Opinion

Petti v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 17, 1969No. 2186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant’s main thrust on appeal surrounds the in-court identification by the victim. The record permits us to conclude that this identification was of a source wholly independent of any earlier confrontation. United States v. Wade, 1967, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Stovall v. Denno, 1967, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199; and Anderson V. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 618.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the defendant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API