Thomas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Judge.
Thomas appeals from his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine1 on the ground that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for acquittal because the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to establish his knowledge and possession of the cocaine. He also asserts the trial court erred in assessing costs against him without giving him notice and making a determination he had the ability to pay them. We affirm the conviction but strike the portion of the order appealed which imposes costs.
The state’s evidence at trial established that at approximately 6:30…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Fowler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Dowell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Pressley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.