Legal Opinion
Riggins v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided October 25, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-2889PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MENTZ, District Judge.
It has come to the Court’s attention that Ford Motor Company has filed a motion for summary judgment set for hearing on Wednesday, October 31, 1984, at 10:00 o’clock a.m. and that plaintiff has failed to submit any timely opposition at least eight days prior to the motion hearing in accordance with Local Rule 3.7 of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana Local Rules. The Court has reviewed Ford’s motion for summary judgment with its attached documents and affidavit and has decided to grant the motion since there appears to be no genuine issue as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gholson v. ThornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Powell v. E. W. Bliss Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Cunningham v. Lynch-Davidson Motors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- Albert Trevino, American National Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Baughman v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
- Albert Trevino, American National Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989