Legal Opinion

In re Quackenbush

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 26, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RELLSTAB, District Judge.

John W. Hanlon seeks a reversal of so much of the referee’s order as disallows priority of his claim for wages. Hanlon’s claim is based on a written agreement made between him .and the bankrupt, which reads:

“Agreement.
“Agreement made and entered into this 30th day of August, A. D. 1915, between John W. Hanlon, of the city of Paterson, county of Passaic, and state of New Jersey, party of the first part, and Harry L. Quackenbush, of the town of Pompton, township of Pequannock, county of Morris, and state of New Jersey, party of the second part, witnesseth:
“Whereas, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blessing v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  2. In re Crown Point Brush Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1912
  3. In re GurewitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  4. Campfield v. LangU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1885
  5. In re GreenbergerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Paradise Catering CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  2. In re Goldman Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API