Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Stratford Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 26, 2015No. 14-1179, 14-1229Published

1Concurring in the judgmentBarron, Circuit Judge

I fully join the decision to certify the duty-to-defend question to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. I do not agree, however, that the Stratford policy, as originally issued, provided no coverage for the *87Ryder tractor. In my view, the original policy did provide such coverage, but the retroactive endorsement then made such coverage excess instead of primary. And thus I end up where the majority does, but by a different route.

As the majority notes, Stratford’s Senior Litigation Specialist, on reviewing the language of Stratford’s policy, concluded “there was an exposure out there that wasn’t…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mathewson Corporation v. Allied Marine Industries, Inc., Brad Foote Gear Works, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company v. Belize Ny, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Lewis v. Equity Nat. Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Blount v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. GRE Insurance Group v. Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API