Legal Opinion
State v. Seely
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
The findings of the county judge that—
“Jesse Seely, adult son of Clara C. Seely, decedent, the sole beneficiary under her will, is an incapacitated, incompetent person, unable to earn his own livelihood, and in all probability such incapacity will be permanent,”
is not attacked. He is entitled to the estate if he qualifies as a legal dependent of Clara C. Seely as the term is used in sec. 45.37 (3) (a), Stats., which provides as follows:
“If any member of the Home shall die without legal dependents, his real property shall descend and his personal property shall be distributed to the state of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Town of Saxville v. BartlettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Schwemer v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stone v. BrewsterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966