Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of Cincinnati
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
PECK, District Judge.
This case has been submitted in consolidation with case No. 247 (291 Fed. 825) in so far as the issue of subrogation is concerned. At the outset it was announced that at this hearing it would be determined who is entitled to assert the chose in action against the city of Cincinnati set forth in the bill, and that the owner so determined would be left to assert his claim in appropriate action at law, hereafter to be brought, in this court or elsewhere. The last clause is now modified, and the question whether plaintiff may pursue its remedy further in this action is not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Maguire v. TrefrySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- H. W. Nelson Co. v. Grand Trunk Western R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935