Legal Opinion

Andreas v. Hinson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Hon. W. S. Withrow, Judge. Action for slander. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $300 and judgment entered thereon. Defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

sef’sensi^n. which words were used: evidence. — The slanderous words charged were, “You are a son of a bitch and a thief.” It is charged that these words were uttered by defendant to the plaintiff in the presence of other persons. The contention of the defendant is that he uttered such words, , . not m a slanderous sense, but m a vitupera- ^ ? *■ tive sense only, and in the heat of anger; that he did not intend to impute any crime to the plaintiff; and that his words were understood by the hearers as not imputing any crime. The trial court instructed the jury that if the words were used only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tathwell v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Reizenstein v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Davis v. MohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. McDonald v. NugentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kiesau v. BantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Winter v. Honeggers'& Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Huegerich v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Burghardt v. Scioto Sign Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Vowles v. YakishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API