Andreas v. Hinson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Hon. W. S. Withrow, Judge. Action for slander. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $300 and judgment entered thereon. Defendant appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
sef’sensi^n. which words were used: evidence. — The slanderous words charged were, “You are a son of a bitch and a thief.” It is charged that these words were uttered by defendant to the plaintiff in the presence of other persons. The contention of the defendant is that he uttered such words, , . not m a slanderous sense, but m a vitupera- ^ ? *■ tive sense only, and in the heat of anger; that he did not intend to impute any crime to the plaintiff; and that his words were understood by the hearers as not imputing any crime. The trial court instructed the jury that if the words were used only…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tathwell v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Reizenstein v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Davis v. MohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- McDonald v. NugentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kiesau v. BantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Winter v. Honeggers'& Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Huegerich v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Burghardt v. Scioto Sign Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Vowles v. YakishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.