Jordan v. Ringstaff
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
In a proceeding to probate an alleged lost will, the burden is on the proponent to establish, to the reasonable satisfaction of the judge or jury trying the facts:(1) The existence of a will — an instrument in writing, signed by the testator or some person in his presence, and by his direction, and attested by at least two witnesses, who must suscribe their names thereto in the presence of the testator. Code 1923, § 10598.(2) The loss or destruction of the instrument — no issue of revocation arising.(3) The contents of the will in substance and effect. Allen v. Scruggs, 190 Ala. 658, 67 So.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jaques v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Allen v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Shorter v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Potts v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Skeggs v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barksdale v. PendergrassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Vaughn v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Lovell v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Allen v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Martin v. WagnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.