Legal Opinion

Massengill v. Scott

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1987PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

This is an action for damages on various theories of tort. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment holding that a previous judgment of the United States District Court rendered on a jury verdict in favor of the defendants in an action for alleged violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 constituted res judicata or collateral estoppel of the issues raised in this case, thereby supporting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

The Court of Appeals sustained the judgment of the trial court, Judge Goddard dissenting. We granted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chamberlain v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Phillips v. Pittsburgh Consolidated Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Poling v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Nieves v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Tennessee Board of DentistryTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Creech v. AddingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Beaty v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. Gibson v. TrantTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re Jack Wayne Bursack, Debtor. Rally Hill Productions, Inc. v. Jack Wayne BursackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API