Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Neal v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 8, 1992No. M-92-47Published
1Concurrence
LUMPKIN, Vice-Presiding Judge,
concurring in results:
Initially, I want to compliment Appellant’s attorney on appeal, Barry L. Derry-berry, Assistant Public Defender, Tulsa County. His reasoned argument compelled further research by this judge which resulted in a withdrawal of my original vote and the further analysis contained in this *922separate opinion. Effective appellate advocacy is not only appreciated, but required if the Court is to be provided the insight needed to address issues of this type.
The Court in this case fails to recognize the issue raised is answered by the provisions of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. James Allen HiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. John Anthony SistoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Stanley StahlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Kelsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.