Legal Opinion

Crawford v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1941No. 7 Div. 569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Judge.

Generally, there is no impropriety in the refusal by the trial court of a charge which instructs the jury that they may consider certain specific testimony or a particular fact in making up their verdict, the reason being that undue emphasis is directed to the particular fact to which such charge is addressed. There is a limited, exceptional class of cases, however, which fall without this rule.

An exception to the rule, stated, has been held to exist where the instruction alludes to a particular witness or his testimony, as bearing upon his credibility. Charges of this kind…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Weaver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Dixon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API