Crawford v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Judge.
Generally, there is no impropriety in the refusal by the trial court of a charge which instructs the jury that they may consider certain specific testimony or a particular fact in making up their verdict, the reason being that undue emphasis is directed to the particular fact to which such charge is addressed. There is a limited, exceptional class of cases, however, which fall without this rule.
An exception to the rule, stated, has been held to exist where the instruction alludes to a particular witness or his testimony, as bearing upon his credibility. Charges of this kind…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Weaver v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dixon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
- Dixon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959