Jackson ex dem. Cantine v. Stiles
New York Supreme Court
1Per curiam
That was sufficient notice.
*495If the landlord is admitted to defend, he cannot be said to appear until he is so admitted, and enters into the consent rule ; so that Clark, if admitted, comes strictly within the letter of the law of the United States, as to the time of presenting his petition.
The notice of the ejectment, was not received by Clark, until the 13th May, so that he is in time to apply at this court.
Kent, Ch. J.
In an ejectment, the landlord is entitled to be made defendant, after judgment has been entered against the tenant, who neglects or refuses to defend. By the judgment of law,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Sampson v. OhleyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Rollins v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Rich v. FlandersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1859
- Cooley v. LawrenceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855
- Suydam v. SmithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.