Legal Opinion · Dissent

McMillan v. United Mortgage Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1966No. 4944Published

1Dissent

Barrett, D. J.,

dissenting:

I dissent.

The appellant has described the problem here involved in his statement of the nature of the action, “This is an appeal from an order denying motion to discharge a writ of attachment.” It is the position of this writer that the decision of this court should be limited to that issue alone, and should not in anywise be based upon a possible ground for a motion to dismiss the entire action, which, it seems to me, is the basis of the majority opinion. If a ground for dismissal exists, then the appellant should have pursued that course under Rule 12, NRCP. At…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Kuehn v. ParoniNevada Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API