Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jackson Manor Nursing Home v. Ortiz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 4, 1992No. 91-2517Published

1DissentErvin, Judge

The majority acknowledges that the 1990 amendment to Section 440.13(2)(f), Florida Statutes, requiring that a physician prescribe home or custodial care, is not applicable to a work-related injury which occurred, as here, prior to the effective date of the amendment. Nevertheless, the majority concludes that, even as to such pre-1990 amendment injuries, a physician must indicate the medical necessity for attendant care, and that conflicting lay testimony to such effect cannot support a judge’s determination of medical necessity for such care. I do not agree.

In the present case, claimant, a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Decks, Inc. of Florida v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Peters v. Armellini Exp. LinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Sealey Mattress Co. v. GauseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Jackson v. Dade County School Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API