Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 2, 2001No. [P.C. No. 2, September Term, 1959 (Adv.).]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an application for leave to appeal under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, Code (1958 Supp.), Art. 27, sec. 645A et seq. The applicant filed a petition for a writ of error coram nobis with Judge Carter, but, with the consent of the petitioner it was treated as a petition under the new Act. Counsel was appointed, and hearings were held before.Judge Allen.

The applicant had pleaded guilty on February 6, 1956, to six charges of larceny of six different automobiles, and been sentenced by Judge Carter to eight years in each case, to run concurrently. He sought to review these convictions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API