Legal Opinion

McMullan v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.

New York City Court

Decided June 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, and from order denying motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order refusing a new trial. McLoughlin’s Washington street house had been lighted by defendant prior to the time hereinafter mentioned. The electric service wires, .in a pipe, passed through the cellar wall about eight feet above the floor, where they, when in use, were in the usual way •connected with the light distributing wire system of the house. In the summer of 1893 this house was undergoing repairs, including, among other things, plumbing and rewiring. Before the work of repair was commenced defendant’s servant disconnected…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Loop v. . LitchfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Swan v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. United States Illuminating Co. v. GrantNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perham v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API