Legal Opinion

Ford v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 14, 1843Published

Error to the Louisville Chancery Court. Principal and Agents. Surety.

1Opinion

Petitton eor a Re-hearcng on the part oe Fords,

October 30.

By Mr. Duncan.

' As the counsel of the Fords, and especially of James C. Ford, I cannot, after reading the opinion, rest satisfied that my duty is fully discharged, without requesting the Court to grant a re-hearing, or at least carefully to re-examine the record and the opinion given.. The opinion says, “the Chancellor shows nor refers to no precedent for the discharge of J. C. Ford, and we are not aware of any adj.udged case or authority directly applicable to that question.” That cannot be a good objection to the decree of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API