Legal Opinion
State v. Rourke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 22, 2009No. A07-937Published
1Opinion of the Court
773 N.W.2d 913 (2009)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Chad Allen ROURKE, Appellant.
No. A07-937.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
October 22, 2009.
Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; Charles C. Glasrud, Stevens County Attorney, Morris, MN; and Thomas R. Ragatz, Special Assistant Stevens County Attorney, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.
Steven P. Russett, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
Appellant Chad Rourke and E.B. began dating in 1998, while E.B. was in high school. They had two children together. Throughout the relationship,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.