Legal Opinion

Cook v. Fogelsonger

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.

Nationwide Insurance Company (herein called “Nationwide”), the third-party defendant, moves under (1) rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the third-party complaint upon the ground that it fails to state a cause of action, and if denied, (2) rule 107, for its dismissal upon the ground that the third-party plaintiff, Arthur Fogelsonger (herein called “ Fogelsonger ”) does not have “ legal capacity ” to sue.

The third-party complaint alleges: That Nationwide issued a liability insurance policy to Fogelsonger numbered 66-91-259 covering his Pontiac automobile, effective November…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Remch v. GrabowNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Conklin v. Palisades Interstate Park CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Kane v. Kane Ship Repair Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API