Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Sternberg
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 7, 1935No. Nos. 261, 262PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
These cases, depending upon the same facts, present the same question. On January 10, 1931, in an insolvency proceeding, Taylor was appointed by a state chancery court in Arkansas receiver of the Parks Dry Goods Company, and Duty as his attorney. On February 11th, a month later, a petition in bankruptcy against the corporation was filed in the federal district court having jurisdiction. Two days later, the corporation was adjudicated a bankrupt. On the same day, the chancery court allowed Taylor compensation as receiver in the sum of $1500, and Duty compensation as attorney in the sum of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Steelman v. All Continent Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Emil v. HanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In the Matter Of: Rimsat, Ltd., Debtor. Paul E. Underwood, Trustee v. Carl B. Hilliard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Callaghan v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.