Legal Opinion

Edison v. Edison

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1980No. Civ. 2203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

The issue presented for our decision is whether the trial court failed to award a sufficient amount for the support of the minor child of the parties.

In this divorce action the trial judge heard the evidence. There was testimony of the earnings, debts, monthly expenses, past and present financial condition, and some history of employment and spending practices of both of the parties. The needs of their four year old child were enumerated. Evidence was presented that, in another case, the defendant became obligated to support his two minor children…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphree v. MurphreeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Pruett v. PruettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Morrow v. MorrowCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Barber v. BarberCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coffelt v. CoffeltCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Reed v. ReedCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API