Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Warden
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 24, 1994No. 12740PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The respondent state prison warden appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of habeas corpus to the petitioner, Joseph Wilson. The trial court ruled that the respondent had incorrectly calculated good time1 credit by failing to aggregate con*504current sentences. On appeal, the respondent asserts that concurrent sentences should not be aggregated for the purpose of calculating good time credit and, therefore, the trial court improperly awarded the petitioner additional good time credit. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
The facts of this case are undisputed. The petitioner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Caltabiano v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Payton v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Holmquist v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Howard v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Wilson v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Mitchell v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.