Legal Opinion

Borland-McBrearty v. Bianco

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1970No. Docket 6,903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The action on which plaintiff recovered judgment below in a non-jury trial and the action which we review is stated in count 2 of plaintiff’s amended complaint. It is an action for damages resulting from misrepresentation of authority by defendant, an agent, to plaintiff. It is an action in tort for fraud. It is not an action for a real estate commission as defendant contends.

In this posture, the relevant issues on appeal are the liability of an agent for misrepresentation to a third person, are the findings of fact clearly erroneous, and, if not, do they support the judgment?

An agent is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snider v. DunnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Charvat v. GildemeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riddle v. Lacey & JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. PRECISION ENTERPRISES v. Duffack Enters.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Precision Enterprises, Inc. v. Duffack Enterprises, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API