Legal Opinion

Berger v. Burnett

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 31, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this case the complainants, who are life tenants, seek a part of the $200,000 proceeds of sale of two hundred shares of common stock of Irvington Varnish and Insulator Company as income.

These shares were part of the estate of Carl Berger, who died in 1920. In his will Berger directed payment of his debts and specific devises and bequests, and then said that all the rest, residue and remainder of his estate, "including my stock, both common and preferred, in said Irvington Varnish and Insulator Company," be given to his executors and trustees in trust. He divided the corpus into two equal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Edwards v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. McCoy v. McCloskeyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  4. Martin v. KimballNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
  5. Martin v. KimballSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of TraungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Case v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  3. Case v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API