Legal Opinion
Flizack v. Good News Home for Women, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 26, 2001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
787 A.2d 228 (2001)
346 N.J. Super. 150
Deborah FLIZACK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GOOD NEWS HOME FOR WOMEN, INC. and Ernestine Winfrey, Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 28, 2001.
Decided December 26, 2001.
Elizabeth Zuckerman, Lawrenceville, argued the cause for appellant (Zuckerman & Fisher, attorneys; Ms. Zuckerman, on the brief).
Charles Z. Schalk, Somerville, argued the cause for respondents (Mauro, Savo, Camerino & Grant, attorneys; Mr. Schalk, of counsel and on the brief).
Before Judges BAIME, NEWMAN, and FALL[1].
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Buckley v. Trenton Saving Fund SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- El-Sioufi v. ST. PETER'S UNIV.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Ivan v. County of MiddlesexDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Hargrave v. County of AtlanticDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Mandel v. UBS/PaineWebber, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Caggiano v. FontouraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.