Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Masip

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1989No. 3218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal taken by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from the judgment of sentence imposed upon Carlos Masip following the latter’s bench trial conviction of possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia and' criminal conspiracy.

On appeal, the Commonwealth complains that the sentencing court abused its discretion when it sentenced Masip to a minimum nine months’ confinement on the charge of possession with intent to manufacture or deliver to be followed with terms of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. LoschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. KnightonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. MalenoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PappasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. ChildsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. BallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API