Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Ray v. Hibner

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided August 6, 1928No. 478PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

The United States invokes the jurisdiction of this court to hear and determine the rights of Indian wards (and their heirs) of the government to the use of the waters of Toponee creek, in Bannoek county, Idaho, for irrigation and domestic purposes, upon the ground that such rights were granted to the Indians under the treaty made between it and them, known as the “Ft. Bridger Treaty,” of February 16, 1869 (15 Stat, 673).’

The complaint sets forth 22 allotments of land granted by the government to the Indians, which were formerly included in the Ft. Hall Indian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Union Grain & Elevator Co. v. McCammon Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Skeem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Colville Confederated Tribes v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Colville Confederated Tribes v. WaltonDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API