Legal Opinion
Hotaling v. General Electric Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division, Third Department, unanimously affirming an order of the Special Term which determined that section 23 of the Civil Practice Act applies to this action. The Appellate Division certified the following questions to this court:
“ 1. Does Civil Practice Act, Section 23, apply to the instant action?
“2. Is the instant action barred by the applicable statutes of limitations? ”
The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff was employed in an iron foundry, by General Electric Company, from October 30, 1946 to March 12, 1951, in various capacities —…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Matter of Decker v. Pouvailsmith Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Claim of Luoma v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Claim of Luoma v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- Werner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cunningham v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Prave v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Glamm v. City of AmsterdamNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- 860 West Tower, Inc. v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.