Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Teague

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 22, 1984No. AV-292Published

1Concurrence

SMITH, Judge,

specially concurring.

I concur in the result reached in Judge Wigginton’s opinion, and write only to express briefly the basis upon which I feel the trial court’s ruling should be affirmed.

First, I find some merit in the state’s position that one carrying an otherwise openly visible firearm within easy reach inside a vehicle with darkly tinted windows may be considered as “carrying” a “concealed weapon.” 1 I am unpersuaded by the argument that since darkness would prevent one from seeing inside a car even with clear windows, the tinted windows on this occasion did not conceal the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ensor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. State v. RiocaboDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Powell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. McGraw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API