Legal Opinion

Sully v. Campbell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

EROM' WASHINGTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Washington County. John P. Smith, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The complainant; as the holder of a note for $3,600 made by Mathes, Hunt, and Campbell & Pouder, filed this bill against the two last named parties for the purpose of obtaining a personal decree against them for the balance due on this note, and also to secure a foreclosure of a specific lien retained in a deed to certain real estate, for the purchase money of which this note (and one other that has been paid) was executed.

The facts that have brought about this controversy, as far as they need be stated, are as follows: The assignor of the complainant conveyed by deed to Mathes, Hunt, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jarnagin v. StrattonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Rose v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  3. Rose v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API