Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Doe

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1977No. 2946Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent.

In Salavea v. City and County of Honolulu, 517 P.2d 51, 55 (Hawaii, 1973) Justice Levinson, concurring and dissenting, said:

The majority opinion is a collapsible house of cards built with a stacked deck which includes a joker in the form of equating the statutory word “State” with the opinion’s “State or political subdivision.”

In the instant case, there are three jokers in the stacked deck. (1) The failure to equate “judge pro tempore” with “judge de facto;” (2) the failure to equate “removed himself” with “recusal;” and (3) the failure to equate “waiver” with “no objection.”

The…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Whitesell v. StricklerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State Ex Rel. Anaya v. ScarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. McGaughey v. GraystonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Heckathorn v. HeckathornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API