Legal Opinion
In re Federated Department Stores, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 8, 1992No. Consolidated Bankruptcy No. 1-90-00130; Bankruptcy Nos. 1-90-00131, 1-90-00142, 1-90-00143, 1-90-00140, 1-90-00141, 1-90-00157, 1-90-00139, 1-90-00132, 1-90-00135, 1-90-00134, 1-90-00170, 1-90-00171, 1-90-00130, 1-90-00173, 1-90-00174, 1-90-00176, 1-90-00136, 1-90-00177, 1-90-00138, 1-90-00145, 1-90-00133 and 1-90-00137PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS’ OBJECTION TO STATE PROOFS OF CLAIM UNDER STATE ABANDONED PROPERTY LAWS
J. VINCENT AUG, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The States of Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah and Washington, and the Commonwealths of Kentucky, Maryland and Pennsylvania (collectively “States”) have filed claims for that property of the Debtors which would qualify as abandoned property under the various States’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arkansas v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992