Legal Opinion

James v. Stonycreek Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1935No. Appeal, 157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Appellant, a township of the first class, awarded to plaintiff a contract to make improvements in four designated streets. A taxpayer’s bill was filed to enjoin on the ground that the debt proposed to be incurred exceeded the constitutional limit, without an election. An injunction was granted but in the decree it was provided: “It also appears from the advertisement and bids sub mitted in respect to the proposed work of improving the three roadways and the additional sewering were asked for and received in separate and distinct items, so that the Township may use…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Potters National Bank v. Ohio TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Foresman v. Gregg TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miners S. Bank v. Duryea BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Cheshire County Convention v. Cheshire County CommissionersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API