Legal Opinion

Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Chappelle

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 12, 2002No. 2:01-cv-71517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

TARNOW, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION 1

This is an appeal by Plaintiff Michigan Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a Ameritech Michigan (“Ameritech”) from a March 19, 2001 decision (“MPSC Order”) by the Michigan Public Service Commission (“MPSC”). Plaintiff Ameritech is suing the individual commissioners of the MPSC, Defendants Laura Chappelle, David A. Svanda, and Robert B. Nelson (“Commissioners”), seeking to enjoin implementation of three aspects of the MPSC Order. MCImetro Access Transmission Services (“MCI”), AT & T Communications of Michigan, and TCG Detroit (collectively “AT…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API