Legal Opinion
Morton v. Morton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 29, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, defendant’s cross motion granted and complaint dismissed without prejudice, in accordance with the following memorandum: CPLR 3215 (c) requires Special Term to dismiss a complaint as abandoned when plaintiff fails to take proceedings for the entry of judgment within one year after default, "unless sufficient cause is shown” (see, Taylor v Edison Parking Corp., 128 AD2d 605; Monzon v Sony Motor, 115 AD2d 714; Grosso v Hauck, 99 AD2d 750; Winkelman v H & S Beer & Soda Discounts, 91 AD2d 660; Valentin v Rinder, 65…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Monzon v. Sony Motor, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Grosso v. HauckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Winkelman v. H & S Beer & Soda Discounts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Baldwin v. St. Clare's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Taylor v. Edison Parking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Turner v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. ReamerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020