Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 17, 2010No. 126 September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*500MURPHY, Judge.

In the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, a jury convicted Karl Lymont Thompson, Petitioner, of second-degree rape and related offenses. The State’s evidence, which included the victim’s testimony, was sufficient to establish that Petitioner committed the rape in 1986 and committed a third-degree sex offense in 1983. Petitioner does not argue to the contrary. He does argue, however, that he is entitled to a new trial. After the Court of Special Appeals affirmed Petitioner’s convictions in Thompson v. State, 181 Md.App. 74, 955 A.2d 802 (2008), he filed a petition for writ of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Beyer v. Morgan State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. In Re Mark M.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. In re Victor B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Woodlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Shannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. People v. HerreraColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Piney Orchard Community Ass'n v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API