Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Peters Mineral Land Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1923No. 6 Div. 893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

A statement of the bill in this cause may be found in the report of the former appeal. 208 Ala. 324, 94 South. 606. On that appeal this court held that the bill filed by the present appellee was defective, and the decree of the trial court sustaining the present appellants’ demurrer was affirmed. On the return of the cause to the circuit court appellee amended paragraph 8 of its bill with a view to the correction of the deficiencies this court had found. Appellants’ demurrer was overruled, and this appeal followed in due time.

As will be observed on reference to the former opinion, appellants…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rea v. Longstreet & SedgwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Fowler v. Alabama Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Peters Mineral Land Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Ruckman v. CorySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Burt v. CassetySupreme Court of Alabama · 1848

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ammons v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  3. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Williams v. MertzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. City of Bessemer v. SchanzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API