Legal Opinion

Brody v. Maril

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 16, 1922No. 6 Div. 561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Construing the allegations of the bill more strictly against the pleader, it must be intended that there was some sort of effective dissolution of the partnership, and an accounting thereof, in the early part of the year 1907, about 12 years prior to the filing of the bill.

As a bill for an accounting and settlement of partnership affairs, more than six years having elapsed since the last partnership transaction, this suit is effectually barred. Stovall v. Clay, 108 Ala. 105, 20 South. 387, and cases cited therein.

But the original bill shows that, though there was no formal dissolution nor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Sayre v. Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Paulling v. Creagh's AdministratorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Holt v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Alabama Coal & Coke Co. v. Gulf Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waters v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Thomson v. BucknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Hand v. BardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Waters v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API