Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Gold Medal of Tennessee, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided December 6, 1994No. 4:94CV749SNLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

869 F.Supp. 745 (1994)

Norvell CARROLL, Plaintiff,

v.

GOLD MEDAL OF TENNESSEE, INC., Defendant.

No. 4:94CV749SNL.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

December 6, 1994.

Christopher C. Oelzen, Librach and Rothman, Clayton, MO, for plaintiff.

Robbye Hill Toft, St. Louis, MO, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LIMBAUGH, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's motion to remand (# 15), filed September 21, 1994. On November 15, 1994 the Court directed defendant Gold Medal to show cause why the motion to remand should not be granted. On November 30, 1994…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grubbs v. General Electric Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Irene Hurt v. Dow Chemical Company Rose Exterminator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Ravens Metal Products, Inc. v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
  4. Veltze v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
  2. Dorsey v. Sekisui America Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
  3. Olberding v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API