Legal Opinion

Munoz v. Irizarri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 20, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants met their prima facie burdens of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject *1057accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that she sustained certain injuries to the cervical and lumbosacral regions of her spine as a result of the subject accident. The defendants provided, inter alia, competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that those alleged injuries did not constitute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Rodriguez v. HuerfanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Dixon v. FullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ragabear v. LallmahamadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API