Legal Opinion
Continental Supply Co. v. Fisher Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 24, 1924No. 26143PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
'The history of this litigation is as follows:
On June 27, 1916, plaintiff sued the Eisher Oil Company, as maker, and G. B. Zigler, as indorser, on a certain promissory note for $11,682.25, with interest 'and attorney’s fees. Zigler answered. His codefendant did not.
The ease was tried, and on April 12, 1917, the district court gave judgment against both defendants in solido, notwithstanding no preliminary default had been entered against the Eisher Oil Company.
On April 25, 1917, defendant Zigler appealed devolutively to this court.
On November 30,1919, the Eisher Oil Company answered the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodcock v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Geisenberger v. CottonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Lips v. Royal Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- South Arkansas Lumber Co. v. Tremont Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Continental Supply Co. v. Fisher Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Melancon v. Continental Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Andrepont v. OchsnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Kern v. KnightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Green v. SmallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Schutzman v. DobrowolskiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.