Legal Opinion

Equitable Trust Co. v. State of Maryland Commission on Human Relations

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 11, 1980No. [No. 53, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall here hold that the Commission on Human Relations failed to comply with a statutory prerequisite for the filing of a complaint on its own motion. Hence, we shall reverse the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals in Equitable Tr. v. State of Md. Comm’n, 42 Md. App. 53, 399 A.2d 908 (1979). For the guidance of trial courts, we shall also discuss the alleged burdensomeness of the subpoena which the Commission here sought to enforce.

The Commission on Human Relations is created and governed by Maryland Code (1957, 1979 Repl. Vol., 1979 Cum. Supp.) Art. 49B. On its own motion it filed a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Harriman v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Fioretti v. Maryland State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Smelser v. Criterion InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API