Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Hefter

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the City Court of the city of New York vacating a prior order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

Hpon the close of the evidence, adduced upon the trial by both parties, the plaintiff moved for judgment for the amount of the note sued upon and the appeal-book shows that, then, after some discussion, the following took place: “ The Court: Without going any further into these decisions which your adversary cites, which are long subsequent to the passage of the Negotiable Instruments Law (and I think the facts are pretty well conceded here), I will discharge the jury from further consideration of the case, and will decide this upon any authorities you desire to submit, and then I will have a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shuttleworth v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Tyler v. HoornbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Rosenquest v. CanaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Anderson v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simpson v. HefterAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API