Legal Opinion

Tate v. Crockett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 25, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CXJLLEN, Commissioner.

William G. Tate brought action against David Patton Crockett, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between Tate’s automobile and Crockett’s tractor-trailer truck. The case was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant. Tate appeals from the judgment entered upon the verdict for the defendant.

The appellant complains primarily of error in the instructions. The appellee, without admitting error in the instructions, maintains that in no event should the judgment be reversed, because Tate was guilty of contributory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCarter v. Louisville & Nashville R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  2. McCarter v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  3. Ashton v. RoopCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  4. Bosshammer v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  5. De Buyser v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clements v. PeytonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  2. Colmes v. Jos. M. Zamoiski Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Mitchell v. Doolittle ex rel. DoolittleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API