Petway v. Goodin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J. contended that plaintiff, by failing to cause a day to be appointed on which the interrogatories should be answered, waived his right to have them taken pro confessis, on the failure to answer. Steioart v. Gaslin, 2 La. 72. Attain v. Truxillo, 14 La. 299.
1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.
The plaintiff, having obtained judgment against the defendants, in solido, for the sum of $1210 07, with interest, issued a writ of fieri facias, by virtue of which the Sheriff seized in the hands of Junius Amis & Co., all the goods, chattels, rights, credits, moneys, and property of any kind, which they might have in their possession or under their control, belonging to the defendants or either of them; whereupon said plaintiff, acting under the 13th section of an act of 1839, (Acts, p. 166,) filed his petition, representing that he has good reason to believe, that Junius Amis &, Go., a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Putnam v. President of the Grand Gulf Rail Road & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- Stewart v. CarlinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1830