Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scott

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 2019No. 3994 EDA 2017PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY NICHOLS, J.:

The Commonwealth appeals from the order granting Appellee Travis Scott's suppression motion. 1 The Commonwealth asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that police lacked probable cause to search the trunk of Appellee's vehicle. We affirm.

The trial court summarized the relevant facts of this case as follows:

A suppression hearing was held on October 30, 2017. [The] Commonwealth called Police Officer Louis Kerr to testify. He was the only witness in this proceeding. Officer Kerr has three and a half years of experience as a police officer, and is assigned to the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Com. v. Barr, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Com. v. Akbar, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Barr, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Brodie, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Brown, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API