Finley v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
This appellant has been convicted of larceny of a steeri
The evidence tending to show appellant’s. guilt was direct and abundant.
The only point of any materiality disclosed by .the record arises out of the following recital in the record: “After being qualified by the Court but before being selected the several jurors on the venire were asked by the attorney for the defendant if any of them depended upon the cattle business for a livelihood. Two jurors auswered in the affirmative. The attorney for the. *57■defendant then requested the Court to disqualify these two jurors. The Court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. PowaskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- State v. Van HoozerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Boyle v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
- Carnaggio v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nettles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Pardue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951