Legal Opinion

Gray v. Dautel

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided June 4, 1906Published

Error.-

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

Levi Wherry & Son, having a carpentry contract under the defendant in error, bought lumber therefor from the plaintiff in error to whom they gave the following order on defendant in error:

*365“Cleveland, Ohio, Oct. 4, 1901.
“Messrs. L. Dautel & Son,

‘ ‘ City.

“Please pay to Ralph Gray thirty-five hundred dollars ($3500.00) and charge the same to our account.'
“Levi Wherry & Son.”

On the following day plaintiff in error collected on this order all that was then due Levi Wherry & Son, to wit, $1,500, leaving $2,000 still owing thereon. Defendant in error, on making this payment, endorsed on the order:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hurd v. Johnson Park Inv. Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API