May v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
Defendant May, represented by appointed appellate counsel, appeals his conviction of two counts of child molestation. Held:
We find no error in the trial court’s determination that defendant validly elected to proceed pro se after being fully apprised of his right to appointed counsel and of the dangers of proceeding without counsel. In addition to defendant’s appearance for trial, the record contains transcripts of the arraignment and of a motion hearing at which defendant was offered appointed counsel and warned of the hazards of proceeding without counsel. In each…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clarke v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Singleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Prater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Rutledge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Wakily v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.